Roseville, PA gender pay gap statistics
In Roseville, the population consists of 68 males (46.90%) and 77 females (53.10%), a breakdown further detailed in Roseville population by gender.
With a gender ratio of 88.3:100 i.e. 88.3 men to 100 women (0.883), Roseville hosts fewer men than women. This demographic distribution sets the backdrop for our exploration into gender-based income disparities within the area.
Historically, addressing gender-based pay differences has been a pressing concern, prompting substantial efforts not only from government initiatives but also from advocacy groups, businesses, and social movements. To explore this further within the context of Roseville, our analysis will focus on examining the income data to understand the reality of gender-based pay differences.
Here are the key findings from our analysis:
- All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Roseville, while the Census reported a median income of $28,712 for all female workers aged 15 years and older, data for males in the same category was unavailable due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
Because income data for males was not available from the Census Bureau, conducting a comprehensive analysis of gender-based pay disparity in the borough of Roseville was not possible.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Roseville, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $70,935, while females earned $34,454, leading to a 51% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 49 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This level of income gap emphasizes the urgency to address and rectify this ongoing disparity, where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same employment roles.
To visualize the evolving trend, here is a line chart depicting the changes in gender-specific annual median incomes over time in Roseville, encompassing both full-time and all workers aged 15 years and older.
Roseville, PA gender and employment-based income distribution analysis (Ages 15+)
To gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Roseville population, we conducted an analysis across 20 distinct brackets for males and females aged 15 years and over, covering both full-time year-round workers and other employment designations.
Within Roseville, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 48 men and 65 women in the workforce. Among them, 23 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 26 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
Analyzing the percentage of full-time, year-round workers to the total workforce reveals that among men, the proportion of full-time employment was 47.92%, whereas among women, the ratio was 40%. This indicates that a higher percentage of men were engaged in full-time, year-round roles compared to women.
The observed disparity may stem from various factors such as industry choices, societal expectations, or employment opportunities, revealing potential gender-based variations in employment trends within Roseville.
Parenthood, for instance, is one such factor influencing these trends. Women between 25 and 44 years old who are mothers are less inclined to participate in the workforce compared to women of the same age without children at home. Furthermore, when employed, these mothers often work fewer hours per week, adding to the observed disparities in full-time employment between genders.
Roseville annual income distribution by work experience and sex (Ages 15+ with income)
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time1 (FT) and part-time2 (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Roseville
| Income Bracket | Full-Time Males | Part-Time Males | Full-Time Females | Part-Time Females |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1 to $2,499 or loss | - | 2 | - | - |
| $2,500 to $4,999 | - | - | - | 1 |
| $5,000 to $7,499 | - | - | - | 2 |
| $7,500 to $9,999 | - | - | - | 3 |
| $10,000 to $12,499 | 4 | 9 | - | 11 |
| $12,500 to $14,999 | - | 2 | 2 | 5 |
| $15,000 to $17,499 | - | 2 | - | 1 |
| $17,500 to $19,999 | - | 5 | - | - |
| $20,000 to $22,499 | - | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| $22,500 to $24,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $25,000 to $29,999 | - | - | 4 | - |
| $30,000 to $34,999 | - | 2 | 6 | 2 |
| $35,000 to $39,999 | 3 | - | 2 | - |
| $40,000 to $44,999 | 2 | 1 | - | 4 |
| $45,000 to $49,999 | - | 1 | - | 7 |
| $50,000 to $54,999 | - | - | 4 | - |
| $55,000 to $64,999 | 2 | - | - | 2 |
| $65,000 to $74,999 | 2 | - | 2 | - |
| $75,000 to $99,999 | 6 | - | 2 | - |
| $100,000 or more | 4 | - | - | - |
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of income distribution, we have grouped the original income brackets into five broader categories for analysis purposes: Under $24,999, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $74,999, $75,000 to $99,999, and above $100,000. This grouping allows for a more focused assessment of income disparities across distinct income ranges, offering clearer insights into gender-based income distributions within the Roseville population.
The analysis unveiled the following key findings:
- Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 17.39% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 23.08% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 84% of males and 61.54% of females were found within this income range.
In total, among the population aged 15 years and older with income, across all employment categories, the analysis revealed that 52.08% of the entire male population and 46.15% of the entire female population fell within the income bracket of under $24,999.
A higher percentage of males compared to females falling within the under $24,999 income bucket suggests a potential disparity, indicating a greater concentration of men in this lower income range.
- Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999: 21.74% of males in full-time employment were within the $25,000 to $49,999 income range, while 46.15% of females in full-time roles were represented in this income bracket. Moreover, among other employment categories, 16% of males and 33.33% of females fell into this income range.
Considering the population aged 15 years and older with income across all employments, 18.75% of the total male population and 38.46% of the total female population were encompassed within this income bracket.
The higher representation of females compared to males in the $25,000 to $49,999 income bracket indicates a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this lower-middle income range.
- Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999: 17.39% of men in full-time employment fell within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket, while 23.08% of women in full-time positions were also within this income range. Furthermore, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and 5.13% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
Overall, considering the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 8.33% of the total male population and 12.31% of the total female population were found within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket.
The higher proportion of females compared to males in the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this middle-income range.
- Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999: 26.09% of men in full-time roles occupied the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket, while 7.69% of women in full-time positions shared this income range. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and none of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
In total, among the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 12.50% of the total male population and 3.08% of the total female population fell within the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket.
The elevated ratio of males to females in the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket hints at a potential inequality, underscoring a stronger predominance of men within this upper-middle income range.
- Annual income above $100,000: 17.39% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while none of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket. Additionally, among those in alternative non-full-time employment, none of men and none of women earned within this income bracket.
In total, across the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 8.33% of the total male population and none of the total female population earned incomes above $100,000.
The increased proportion of males compared to females in the above $100,000 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater predominance of men in this higher income range.
