Paynesville, MO gender pay gap statistics
In Paynesville, the population consists of 21 males (63.64%) and 12 females (36.36%), a breakdown further detailed in Paynesville population by gender.
With a gender ratio of 175:100 i.e. 175 men to 100 women (1.750), Paynesville hosts more men than women. This demographic distribution sets the backdrop for our exploration into gender-based income disparities within the area.
Historically, addressing gender-based pay differences has been a pressing concern, prompting substantial efforts not only from government initiatives but also from advocacy groups, businesses, and social movements. To explore this further within the context of Paynesville, our analysis will focus on examining the income data to understand the reality of gender-based pay differences.
Here are the key findings from our analysis:
- All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Paynesville, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $19,816 for males and $31,752 for females.
Contrary to expectations, women in Paynesville, women, regardless of work hours, earn a higher income than men, earning 1.6 dollars for every dollar earned by men. This analysis indicates a significant shift in income dynamics favoring females.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Paynesville, for full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, the Census Bureau did not report the median income for both males and females due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
As income data for both males and females was unavailable, conducting a comprehensive analysis of gender-based pay disparity in the village of Paynesville was not possible.
To visualize the evolving trend, here is a line chart depicting the changes in gender-specific annual median incomes over time in Paynesville, encompassing both full-time and all workers aged 15 years and older.
Paynesville, MO gender and employment-based income distribution analysis (Ages 15+)
To gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Paynesville population, we conducted an analysis across 20 distinct brackets for males and females aged 15 years and over, covering both full-time year-round workers and other employment designations.
Within Paynesville, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 18 men and 7 women in the workforce. Among them, 3 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 3 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
Analyzing the percentage of full-time, year-round workers to the total workforce reveals that among men, the proportion of full-time employment was 16.67%, whereas among women, the ratio was 42.86%. This indicates that a higher percentage of women were engaged in full-time, year-round roles compared to men.
Paynesville annual income distribution by work experience and sex (Ages 15+ with income)
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time1 (FT) and part-time2 (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Paynesville
| Income Bracket | Full-Time Males | Part-Time Males | Full-Time Females | Part-Time Females |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1 to $2,499 or loss | - | - | - | - |
| $2,500 to $4,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $5,000 to $7,499 | - | 3 | - | - |
| $7,500 to $9,999 | - | - | - | 1 |
| $10,000 to $12,499 | - | - | - | - |
| $12,500 to $14,999 | 2 | - | - | - |
| $15,000 to $17,499 | - | 2 | - | 1 |
| $17,500 to $19,999 | - | 6 | - | - |
| $20,000 to $22,499 | - | - | - | - |
| $22,500 to $24,999 | 1 | - | - | - |
| $25,000 to $29,999 | - | - | - | 2 |
| $30,000 to $34,999 | - | 2 | - | - |
| $35,000 to $39,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $40,000 to $44,999 | - | - | 2 | - |
| $45,000 to $49,999 | - | 2 | - | - |
| $50,000 to $54,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $55,000 to $64,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $65,000 to $74,999 | - | - | 1 | - |
| $75,000 to $99,999 | - | - | - | - |
| $100,000 or more | - | - | - | - |
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of income distribution, we have grouped the original income brackets into five broader categories for analysis purposes: Under $24,999, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $74,999, $75,000 to $99,999, and above $100,000. This grouping allows for a more focused assessment of income disparities across distinct income ranges, offering clearer insights into gender-based income distributions within the Paynesville population.
The analysis unveiled the following key findings:
- Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 100% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while none of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 73.33% of males and 50% of females were found within this income range.
In total, among the population aged 15 years and older with income, across all employment categories, the analysis revealed that 77.78% of the entire male population and 28.57% of the entire female population fell within the income bracket of under $24,999.
A higher percentage of males compared to females falling within the under $24,999 income bucket suggests a potential disparity, indicating a greater concentration of men in this lower income range.
- Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999: none of males in full-time employment were within the $25,000 to $49,999 income range, while 66.67% of females in full-time roles were represented in this income bracket. Moreover, among other employment categories, 26.67% of males and 50% of females fell into this income range.
Considering the population aged 15 years and older with income across all employments, 22.22% of the total male population and 57.14% of the total female population were encompassed within this income bracket.
The higher representation of females compared to males in the $25,000 to $49,999 income bracket indicates a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this lower-middle income range.
- Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999: none of men in full-time employment fell within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket, while 33.33% of women in full-time positions were also within this income range. Furthermore, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and none of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
Overall, considering the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, none of the total male population and 14.29% of the total female population were found within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket.
The higher proportion of females compared to males in the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this middle-income range.
- Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999: none of men in full-time roles occupied the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket, while none of women in full-time positions shared this income range. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and none of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
In total, among the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, none of the total male population and none of the total female population fell within the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket.
The equal ratio of males to females in the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket hints at a potential equality, underscoring a stronger predominance of no gender within this upper-middle income range.
- Annual income above $100,000: none of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while none of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket. Additionally, among those in alternative non-full-time employment, none of men and none of women earned within this income bracket.
In total, across the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, none of the total male population and none of the total female population earned incomes above $100,000.
The equal proportion of males compared to females in the above $100,000 income bracket suggests a potential equality, emphasizing a greater predominance of no gender in this higher income range.
