Martin, MI annual median income by work experience and sex (Aged 15+, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
The table presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Martin. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time1 and part-time2 work.
Year | Male Total Income | Male FT Income | Male PT Income | Female Total Income | Female FT Income | Female PT Income |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $35,559 | $40,090 | $30,921 | $25,089 | $46,611 | $17,288 |
2011 | $36,389 | $38,274 | $33,156 | $24,517 | $48,053 | $15,691 |
2012 | $36,454 | $56,835 | $32,220 | $24,929 | $54,968 | $16,010 |
2013 | $34,471 | $39,743 | $31,768 | $26,614 | $59,931 | $19,872 |
2014 | $30,320 | $38,782 | $24,377 | $22,959 | $59,879 | $19,169 |
2015 | $30,862 | $41,038 | $24,158 | $22,525 | $60,653 | $18,197 |
2016 | $29,761 | $38,527 | $22,933 | $22,933 | $53,509 | $18,499 |
2017 | $36,677 | $43,413 | $23,204 | $23,453 | $54,320 | $17,403 |
2018 | $36,134 | $52,120 | $19,896 | $23,219 | $55,348 | $15,941 |
2019 | $43,058 | $55,976 | $27,988 | $25,028 | $56,263 | $15,669 |
2020 | $35,771 | $36,493 | $26,397 | $22,886 | $55,949 | $14,429 |
2021 | $34,724 | $35,693 | $27,173 | $18,646 | $57,423 | $11,967 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Martin, MI gender pay gap statistics
In Martin, the population consists of 291 males (57.17%) and 218 females (42.83%), a breakdown further detailed in Martin population by gender.
With a gender ratio of 133.5:100 i.e. 133.5 men to 100 women (1.335), Martin hosts more men than women. This demographic distribution sets the backdrop for our exploration into gender-based income disparities within the area.
Historically, addressing gender-based pay differences has been a pressing concern, prompting substantial efforts not only from government initiatives but also from advocacy groups, businesses, and social movements. To explore this further within the context of Martin, our analysis will focus on examining the income data to understand the reality of gender-based pay differences.
Here are the key findings from our analysis:
- All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Martin, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $34,724 for males and $18,646 for females.
These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in Martin. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 54 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 46%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the village of Martin.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Martin, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $35,693, while females earned $57,423
Surprisingly, within the subset of full-time workers, women earn a higher income than men, earning 1.61 dollars for every dollar earned by men. This suggests that within full-time roles, womens median incomes significantly surpass mens, contrary to broader workforce trends.
To visualize the evolving trend, here is a line chart depicting the changes in gender-specific annual median incomes over time in Martin, encompassing both full-time and all workers aged 15 years and older.
Martin, MI gender and employment-based income distribution analysis (Ages 15+)
To gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Martin population, we conducted an analysis across 20 distinct brackets for males and females aged 15 years and over, covering both full-time year-round workers and other employment designations.
Within Martin, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 206 men and 183 women in the workforce. Among them, 143 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 61 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
Analyzing the percentage of full-time, year-round workers to the total workforce reveals that among men, the proportion of full-time employment was 69.42%, whereas among women, the ratio was 33.33%. This indicates that a higher percentage of men were engaged in full-time, year-round roles compared to women.
The observed disparity may stem from various factors such as industry choices, societal expectations, or employment opportunities, revealing potential gender-based variations in employment trends within Martin.
Parenthood, for instance, is one such factor influencing these trends. Women between 25 and 44 years old who are mothers are less inclined to participate in the workforce compared to women of the same age without children at home. Furthermore, when employed, these mothers often work fewer hours per week, adding to the observed disparities in full-time employment between genders.
Martin annual income distribution by work experience and sex (Ages 15+ with income)
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time1 (FT) and part-time2 (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Martin
Income Bracket | Full-Time Males | Part-Time Males | Full-Time Females | Part-Time Females |
---|---|---|---|---|
$1 to $2,499 or loss | - | 5 | 2 | 8 |
$2,500 to $4,999 | - | 6 | - | 4 |
$5,000 to $7,499 | - | - | - | 7 |
$7,500 to $9,999 | - | 1 | 2 | 36 |
$10,000 to $12,499 | 2 | 2 | - | 14 |
$12,500 to $14,999 | - | 3 | 2 | 12 |
$15,000 to $17,499 | - | 6 | - | 5 |
$17,500 to $19,999 | - | - | - | - |
$20,000 to $22,499 | - | 2 | 7 | 9 |
$22,500 to $24,999 | - | 6 | 4 | 5 |
$25,000 to $29,999 | 9 | 10 | - | 6 |
$30,000 to $34,999 | 70 | 7 | 2 | 5 |
$35,000 to $39,999 | - | - | 2 | 1 |
$40,000 to $44,999 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 1 |
$45,000 to $49,999 | 13 | 3 | 3 | 2 |
$50,000 to $54,999 | 2 | 5 | 7 | 1 |
$55,000 to $64,999 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 3 |
$65,000 to $74,999 | 12 | 1 | 12 | 1 |
$75,000 to $99,999 | 6 | - | 7 | 2 |
$100,000 or more | 19 | - | 4 | - |
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of income distribution, we have grouped the original income brackets into five broader categories for analysis purposes: Under $24,999, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $74,999, $75,000 to $99,999, and above $100,000. This grouping allows for a more focused assessment of income disparities across distinct income ranges, offering clearer insights into gender-based income distributions within the Martin population.
The analysis unveiled the following key findings:
- Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 1.40% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 27.87% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 49.21% of males and 81.97% of females were found within this income range.
In total, among the population aged 15 years and older with income, across all employment categories, the analysis revealed that 16.02% of the entire male population and 63.93% of the entire female population fell within the income bracket of under $24,999.
A higher percentage of females compared to males falling within the under $24,999 income bucket suggests a potential disparity, indicating a greater concentration of women in this lower income range.
- Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999: 67.13% of males in full-time employment were within the $25,000 to $49,999 income range, while 13.11% of females in full-time roles were represented in this income bracket. Moreover, among other employment categories, 38.10% of males and 12.30% of females fell into this income range.
Considering the population aged 15 years and older with income across all employments, 58.25% of the total male population and 12.57% of the total female population were encompassed within this income bracket.
The higher representation of males compared to females in the $25,000 to $49,999 income bracket indicates a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of men within this lower-middle income range.
- Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999: 13.99% of men in full-time employment fell within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket, while 40.98% of women in full-time positions were also within this income range. Furthermore, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 12.70% of men and 4.10% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
Overall, considering the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 13.59% of the total male population and 16.39% of the total female population were found within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket.
The higher proportion of females compared to males in the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this middle-income range.
- Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999: 4.20% of men in full-time roles occupied the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket, while 11.48% of women in full-time positions shared this income range. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and 1.64% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
In total, among the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 2.91% of the total male population and 4.92% of the total female population fell within the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket.
The elevated ratio of females to males in the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket hints at a potential inequality, underscoring a stronger predominance of women within this upper-middle income range.
- Annual income above $100,000: 13.29% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 6.56% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket. Additionally, among those in alternative non-full-time employment, none of men and none of women earned within this income bracket.
In total, across the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 9.22% of the total male population and 2.19% of the total female population earned incomes above $100,000.
The increased proportion of males compared to females in the above $100,000 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater predominance of men in this higher income range.
Things to know
Is there a gender-based pay gap in Martin, MI?
In Martin, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $34,724 for males and $18,646 for females.
These income figures highlight a substantial gender-based income gap in Martin. Women, regardless of work hours, earn 54 cents for each dollar earned by men. This significant gender pay gap, approximately 46%, underscores concerning gender-based income inequality in the village of Martin.
What is the average annual income for a women in Martin, MI?
The median income for females aged 15 years and older in Martin is $18,646, indicating that half of the female population in this age group earns more than this figure, while the other half earns less. This data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
What is the average annual income for men in Martin, MI?
The median income for males aged 15 years and older in Martin is $34,724, indicating that half of the male population in this age group earns more than this figure, while the other half earns less. This data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
Is $100,000 considered low annual income in Martin, MI?
In Martin, among individuals aged 15 years and older working full-time year-round, 13.29% of men and 6.56% of women earned incomes surpassing $100,000. This indicates that for both men and women, the percentage earning above $100,000 is relatively low.
References
- U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates
- Consumer Price Index retroactive series using current methods (R-CPI-U-RS)
Notes
The analysis presented in this article is based on estimates derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey. While these figures offer valuable insights, they are subject to a margin of error. It is advisable to exercise caution and consider the potential margin of error when interpreting and utilizing this data.