Hinds County, MS gender pay gap statistics
In Hinds County, the population consists of 108,362 males (46.96%) and 122,410 females (53.04%), a breakdown further detailed in Hinds County population by gender.
With a gender ratio of 88.5:100 i.e. 88.5 men to 100 women (0.885), Hinds County hosts fewer men than women. This demographic distribution sets the backdrop for our exploration into gender-based income disparities within the area.
Historically, addressing gender-based pay differences has been a pressing concern, prompting substantial efforts not only from government initiatives but also from advocacy groups, businesses, and social movements. To explore this further within the context of Hinds County, our analysis will focus on examining the income data to understand the reality of gender-based pay differences.
Here are the key findings from our analysis:
- All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Hinds County, the median income for all workers aged 15 years and older, regardless of work hours, was $30,453 for males and $25,715 for females.
These income figures indicate a substantial gender-based pay disparity, showcasing a gap of approximately 16% between the median incomes of males and females in Hinds County. With women, regardless of work hours, earning 84 cents to each dollar earned by men, this income disparity reveals a concerning trend toward wage inequality that demands attention in thecounty of Hinds County.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Hinds County, among full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, males earned a median income of $51,835, while females earned $40,615, leading to a 22% gender pay gap among full-time workers. This illustrates that women earn 78 cents for each dollar earned by men in full-time roles. This analysis indicates a widening gender pay gap, showing a substantial income disparity where women, despite working full-time, face a more significant wage discrepancy compared to men in the same roles.
Remarkably, across all roles, including non-full-time employment, women displayed a similar gender pay gap percentage. This indicates a consistent gender pay gap scenario across various employment types in Hinds County, showcasing a consistent income pattern irrespective of employment status.
To visualize the evolving trend, here is a line chart depicting the changes in gender-specific annual median incomes over time in Hinds County, encompassing both full-time and all workers aged 15 years and older.
Hinds County, MS gender and employment-based income distribution analysis (Ages 15+)
To gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Hinds County population, we conducted an analysis across 20 distinct brackets for males and females aged 15 years and over, covering both full-time year-round workers and other employment designations.
Within Hinds County, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 69,632 men and 83,135 women in the workforce. Among them, 36,060 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 37,087 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
Analyzing the percentage of full-time, year-round workers to the total workforce reveals that among men, the proportion of full-time employment was 51.79%, whereas among women, the ratio was 44.61%. This indicates that a higher percentage of men were engaged in full-time, year-round roles compared to women.
The observed disparity may stem from various factors such as industry choices, societal expectations, or employment opportunities, revealing potential gender-based variations in employment trends within Hinds County.
Parenthood, for instance, is one such factor influencing these trends. Women between 25 and 44 years old who are mothers are less inclined to participate in the workforce compared to women of the same age without children at home. Furthermore, when employed, these mothers often work fewer hours per week, adding to the observed disparities in full-time employment between genders.
Hinds County annual income distribution by work experience and sex (Ages 15+ with income)
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time1 (FT) and part-time2 (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Hinds County
| Income Bracket | Full-Time Males | Part-Time Males | Full-Time Females | Part-Time Females |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| $1 to $2,499 or loss | - | 3,061 | 149 | 6,419 |
| $2,500 to $4,999 | - | 3,012 | 107 | 2,691 |
| $5,000 to $7,499 | 946 | 1,644 | 718 | 3,092 |
| $7,500 to $9,999 | 178 | 2,473 | 696 | 3,938 |
| $10,000 to $12,499 | 298 | 4,244 | 1,038 | 5,329 |
| $12,500 to $14,999 | 763 | 1,958 | 386 | 5,285 |
| $15,000 to $17,499 | 1,101 | 2,615 | 531 | 2,937 |
| $17,500 to $19,999 | 80 | 919 | 381 | 1,602 |
| $20,000 to $22,499 | 1,765 | 1,169 | 903 | 1,039 |
| $22,500 to $24,999 | 1,684 | 1,146 | 917 | 2,263 |
| $25,000 to $29,999 | 2,281 | 3,064 | 3,923 | 2,302 |
| $30,000 to $34,999 | 2,253 | 1,448 | 3,761 | 1,784 |
| $35,000 to $39,999 | 2,339 | 670 | 4,213 | 792 |
| $40,000 to $44,999 | 2,096 | 776 | 4,045 | 971 |
| $45,000 to $49,999 | 1,249 | 266 | 2,090 | 656 |
| $50,000 to $54,999 | 2,631 | 531 | 2,619 | 700 |
| $55,000 to $64,999 | 3,543 | 1,209 | 3,382 | 1,482 |
| $65,000 to $74,999 | 3,016 | 686 | 1,703 | 538 |
| $75,000 to $99,999 | 4,497 | 947 | 2,152 | 1,556 |
| $100,000 or more | 5,340 | 1,734 | 3,373 | 672 |
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of income distribution, we have grouped the original income brackets into five broader categories for analysis purposes: Under $24,999, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $74,999, $75,000 to $99,999, and above $100,000. This grouping allows for a more focused assessment of income disparities across distinct income ranges, offering clearer insights into gender-based income distributions within the Hinds County population.
The analysis unveiled the following key findings:
- Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, 18.90% fell within the income range of under $24,999, while 15.71% of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 66.25% of males and 75.13% of females were found within this income range.
In total, among the population aged 15 years and older with income, across all employment categories, the analysis revealed that 41.73% of the entire male population and 48.62% of the entire female population fell within the income bracket of under $24,999.
A higher percentage of females compared to males falling within the under $24,999 income bucket suggests a potential disparity, indicating a greater concentration of women in this lower income range.
- Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999: 28.34% of males in full-time employment were within the $25,000 to $49,999 income range, while 48.62% of females in full-time roles were represented in this income bracket. Moreover, among other employment categories, 18.54% of males and 14.13% of females fell into this income range.
Considering the population aged 15 years and older with income across all employments, 23.61% of the total male population and 29.51% of the total female population were encompassed within this income bracket.
The higher representation of females compared to males in the $25,000 to $49,999 income bracket indicates a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of women within this lower-middle income range.
- Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999: 25.49% of men in full-time employment fell within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket, while 20.77% of women in full-time positions were also within this income range. Furthermore, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 7.23% of men and 5.91% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
Overall, considering the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 16.68% of the total male population and 12.54% of the total female population were found within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket.
The higher proportion of males compared to females in the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of men within this middle-income range.
- Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999: 12.47% of men in full-time roles occupied the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket, while 5.80% of women in full-time positions shared this income range. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 2.82% of men and 3.38% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
In total, among the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 7.82% of the total male population and 4.46% of the total female population fell within the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket.
The elevated ratio of males to females in the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket hints at a potential inequality, underscoring a stronger predominance of men within this upper-middle income range.
- Annual income above $100,000: 14.81% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 9.09% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket. Additionally, among those in alternative non-full-time employment, 5.17% of men and 1.46% of women earned within this income bracket.
In total, across the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 10.16% of the total male population and 4.87% of the total female population earned incomes above $100,000.
The increased proportion of males compared to females in the above $100,000 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater predominance of men in this higher income range.
