Garden City, UT annual median income by work experience and sex (Aged 15+, in 2022 inflation-adjusted dollars)
The table presents median income data over a decade or more for males and females categorized by Total, Full-Time Year-Round (FT), and Part-Time (PT) employment in Garden City. It showcases annual income, providing insights into gender-specific income distributions and the disparities between full-time1 and part-time2 work.
Year | Male Total Income | Male FT Income | Male PT Income | Female Total Income | Female FT Income | Female PT Income |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2010 | $60,437 | $61,392 | $45,961 | $27,085 | $29,235 | $14,899 |
2011 | $42,441 | $42,441 | $40,862 | $9,262 | $30,510 | $8,354 |
2012 | $46,429 | $57,316 | $37,623 | $10,727 | $8,919 | $11,047 |
2013 | $38,443 | $57,171 | $24,992 | $10,179 | $8,602 | $10,610 |
2014 | $39,730 | $54,812 | $24,463 | $11,634 | $8,532 | $12,188 |
2015 | $39,067 | $63,492 | $23,229 | $12,182 | $27,294 | $11,512 |
2016 | $38,298 | $63,447 | $21,064 | $16,330 | $31,915 | $13,454 |
2017 | $38,174 | $77,096 | $17,665 | $15,686 | $35,555 | $12,091 |
2018 | $47,015 | - | $20,459 | $15,587 | $37,994 | $12,275 |
2019 | $36,634 | $47,536 | $18,864 | $19,775 | $34,178 | $12,289 |
2020 | $38,716 | $46,742 | $18,818 | - | $33,817 | $12,512 |
2021 | $46,170 | $47,791 | $18,195 | - | - | $12,329 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Garden City, UT gender pay gap statistics
In Garden City, the population consists of 165 males (53.05%) and 146 females (46.95%), a breakdown further detailed in Garden City population by gender.
With a gender ratio of 113:100 i.e. 113 men to 100 women (1.130), Garden City hosts more men than women. This demographic distribution sets the backdrop for our exploration into gender-based income disparities within the area.
Historically, addressing gender-based pay differences has been a pressing concern, prompting substantial efforts not only from government initiatives but also from advocacy groups, businesses, and social movements. To explore this further within the context of Garden City, our analysis will focus on examining the income data to understand the reality of gender-based pay differences.
Here are the key findings from our analysis:
- All workers, aged 15 years and older: In Garden City, while the Census reported a median income of $46,170 for all male workers aged 15 years and older, data for females in the same category was unavailable due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
Given the absence of income data for females from the Census Bureau, conducting a thorough analysis of gender-based pay disparity in the town of Garden City was not possible.
- Full-time workers, aged 15 years and older: In Garden City, for full-time, year-round workers aged 15 years and older, while the Census reported a median income of $47,791 for males, while data for females was unavailable due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
As there was no available median income data for females, conducting a comprehensive assessment of gender-based pay disparity in Garden City was not feasible.
To visualize the evolving trend, here is a line chart depicting the changes in gender-specific annual median incomes over time in Garden City, encompassing both full-time and all workers aged 15 years and older.
Garden City, UT gender and employment-based income distribution analysis (Ages 15+)
To gain insights into gender-based income distribution within the Garden City population, we conducted an analysis across 20 distinct brackets for males and females aged 15 years and over, covering both full-time year-round workers and other employment designations.
Within Garden City, among individuals aged 15 years and older with income, there were 108 men and 76 women in the workforce. Among them, 66 men were engaged in full-time, year-round employment, while 14 women were in full-time, year-round roles.
Analyzing the percentage of full-time, year-round workers to the total workforce reveals that among men, the proportion of full-time employment was 61.11%, whereas among women, the ratio was 18.42%. This indicates that a higher percentage of men were engaged in full-time, year-round roles compared to women.
The observed disparity may stem from various factors such as industry choices, societal expectations, or employment opportunities, revealing potential gender-based variations in employment trends within Garden City.
Parenthood, for instance, is one such factor influencing these trends. Women between 25 and 44 years old who are mothers are less inclined to participate in the workforce compared to women of the same age without children at home. Furthermore, when employed, these mothers often work fewer hours per week, adding to the observed disparities in full-time employment between genders.
Garden City annual income distribution by work experience and sex (Ages 15+ with income)
The following table provides a detailed breakdown of the count of individuals within distinct income brackets, categorizing them by gender (men and women) and employment type - full-time1 (FT) and part-time2 (PT), offering valuable insights into the diverse income landscapes within Garden City
Income Bracket | Full-Time Males | Part-Time Males | Full-Time Females | Part-Time Females |
---|---|---|---|---|
$1 to $2,499 or loss | - | - | - | 11 |
$2,500 to $4,999 | - | - | - | - |
$5,000 to $7,499 | - | - | - | - |
$7,500 to $9,999 | - | - | - | 11 |
$10,000 to $12,499 | - | 3 | - | 16 |
$12,500 to $14,999 | - | 7 | - | - |
$15,000 to $17,499 | - | 15 | - | 4 |
$17,500 to $19,999 | - | 7 | - | - |
$20,000 to $22,499 | - | 10 | - | - |
$22,500 to $24,999 | - | - | - | - |
$25,000 to $29,999 | - | - | - | - |
$30,000 to $34,999 | 9 | - | 11 | 15 |
$35,000 to $39,999 | - | - | - | - |
$40,000 to $44,999 | 35 | - | - | - |
$45,000 to $49,999 | - | - | - | - |
$50,000 to $54,999 | 9 | - | - | - |
$55,000 to $64,999 | - | - | - | 5 |
$65,000 to $74,999 | - | - | - | - |
$75,000 to $99,999 | - | - | - | - |
$100,000 or more | 13 | - | 3 | - |
To provide a more comprehensive understanding of income distribution, we have grouped the original income brackets into five broader categories for analysis purposes: Under $24,999, $25,000 to $49,999, $50,000 to $74,999, $75,000 to $99,999, and above $100,000. This grouping allows for a more focused assessment of income disparities across distinct income ranges, offering clearer insights into gender-based income distributions within the Garden City population.
The analysis unveiled the following key findings:
- Annual income under $24,999: Of the male population working full-time, none fell within the income range of under $24,999, while none of the female population working full-time was represented in the same income bracket. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, 100% of males and 67.74% of females were found within this income range.
In total, among the population aged 15 years and older with income, across all employment categories, the analysis revealed that 38.89% of the entire male population and 55.26% of the entire female population fell within the income bracket of under $24,999.
A higher percentage of females compared to males falling within the under $24,999 income bucket suggests a potential disparity, indicating a greater concentration of women in this lower income range.
- Annual income between $25,000 and $49,999: 66.67% of males in full-time employment were within the $25,000 to $49,999 income range, while 78.57% of females in full-time roles were represented in this income bracket. Moreover, among other employment categories, none of males and 24.19% of females fell into this income range.
Considering the population aged 15 years and older with income across all employments, 40.74% of the total male population and 34.21% of the total female population were encompassed within this income bracket.
The higher representation of males compared to females in the $25,000 to $49,999 income bracket indicates a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of men within this lower-middle income range.
- Annual income between $50,000 and $74,999: 13.64% of men in full-time employment fell within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket, while none of women in full-time positions were also within this income range. Furthermore, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and 8.06% of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
Overall, considering the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 8.33% of the total male population and 6.58% of the total female population were found within the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket.
The higher proportion of males compared to females in the $50,000 to $74,999 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater prevalence of men within this middle-income range.
- Annual income between $75,000 and $99,999: none of men in full-time roles occupied the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket, while none of women in full-time positions shared this income range. Additionally, among individuals in other non-full-time employment categories, none of men and none of women were situated within this specific income bracket.
In total, among the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, none of the total male population and none of the total female population fell within the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket.
The equal ratio of males to females in the $75,000 to $99,999 income bracket hints at a potential equality, underscoring a stronger predominance of no gender within this upper-middle income range.
- Annual income above $100,000: 19.70% of men in full-time roles earned incomes exceeding $100,000, while 21.43% of women in full-time positions earned within this income bracket. Additionally, among those in alternative non-full-time employment, none of men and none of women earned within this income bracket.
In total, across the entire population aged 15 years and older with income across all job types, 12.04% of the total male population and 3.95% of the total female population earned incomes above $100,000.
The increased proportion of males compared to females in the above $100,000 income bracket suggests a potential inequality, emphasizing a greater predominance of men in this higher income range.
Things to know
Is there a gender-based pay gap in Garden City, UT?
In Garden City, while the Census reported a median income of $46,170 for all male workers aged 15 years and older, data for females in the same category was unavailable due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
Given the absence of income data for females from the Census Bureau, conducting a thorough analysis of gender-based pay disparity in the town of Garden City was not possible.
What is the average annual income for a women in Garden City, UT?
For Garden City, the American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates did not report the median income for females aged 15 years and older, due to an insufficient number of sample observations.
What is the average annual income for men in Garden City, UT?
The median income for males aged 15 years and older in Garden City is $46,170, indicating that half of the male population in this age group earns more than this figure, while the other half earns less. This data is sourced from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates.
Is $100,000 considered low annual income in Garden City, UT?
In Garden City, among individuals aged 15 years and older working full-time year-round, 19.70% of men and 21.43% of women earned incomes surpassing $100,000. This indicates that for both men and women, the percentage earning above $100,000 is relatively low.
References
- U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey (ACS) 2017-2021 5-Year Estimates
- Consumer Price Index retroactive series using current methods (R-CPI-U-RS)
Notes
The analysis presented in this article is based on estimates derived from the U.S. Census Bureau American Community Survey. While these figures offer valuable insights, they are subject to a margin of error. It is advisable to exercise caution and consider the potential margin of error when interpreting and utilizing this data.